The New Jersey Appellate Division in an unpublished decision, Cesar S. Arredondo v. Nersy Pujols, Docket No. A-5459-05T25459-05T2, ruled that breaches of both of a lease provision and a New Jersey statute for failing to obtain municipal permits before commencing construction work were NOT grounds for evicting a commercial tenant.  Although very fact specific to a landlord with apparently “unclean hands”, this decision highlights pitfalls that can beset a landlord in the New Jersey eviction process.

Cannot Evict for “Minor” Breaches (No Permits, No Insurance, Sidewalk Sales, Etc.)

The Appellate Division agreed with the trial court on the insurance issue and the landlord’s inconsistent testimony.  However, the Appellate Division held that the breach was “not material” to warrant the tenant’s forfeiture of his leasehold interest. The Appellate Division noted that the New Jersey statute specifically provides grounds for an eviction where there is a “…violation of such covenants or agreements” of the lease. See N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53.  However, before a judgment may be entered, the landlord must establish the breach. 

Citing New Jersey case law, the Appellate Division held an eviction based on a “forfeiture” is deemed a penalty for failing to do a particular thing.  In New Jersey, the law does not favor forfeitures and requires a trial court to strictly review the provisions of the lease that a landlord seeks to forfeit the tenant’s interest, resolving any ambiguous language in favor of the tenant.

Based on the testimony and review of the lease, the Appellate Division held the breach was a minor deviation of the lease terms.  The court held that the work was undertaken under the direct order of the plaintiff and done by an independent contractor.  Further, all work was done in a workman-like fashion and that pursuant to the Jersey City inspector, the defendant could retroactively cure any of the code violations by obtaining a permit. 

Concerns for Landlords When Instituting Eviction Action Payment Defaults

This unpublished decision raises a number of pitfalls for commercial landlords. In this case, the landlord clearly failed to submit the proper proofs.  Before instituting an action to evict a tenant, landlords should consider a number is issues including:

1)     What proofs do I have?  In this case, the landlord had serious inconsistent statement, whereas the tenant’s testimony was not questioned.  Further, the tenant had two additional witnesses to prove his case, one being a city electrical inspector; and

2)     Is the Breach “Material”?  Here, failure to obtain permits was not “material”.  However, would that have changed if what the landlord was cited for resulted in a fine or penalty from the municipality?

3)     Can the Breach be Remedied before Trial?  Here, the alleged breach of the lease became a non-issue because it was remedied prior to trial. What other breaches can be remedied?

Strategic Use of Eviction Proceedings

This and other recent decisions by the Appellate Division raise pitfalls for commercial landlords in eviction proceedings. Landlords may think to strategically use the eviction process as a way in which to make the tenants become compliant with the lease.  To lessen the legal costs, landlords should take care to place in their lease that the tenant is required to pay the landlord’s attorney fees. 

In the case discussed, although an eviction did not occur, the act of taking the case to trial precipitated the tenant to obtain the proper permits and get insurance.  However, if a landlord wishes to actually evict the tenant, it is extremely important to sit down with your attorney ascertain “minor” or technical breaches.

For more information on evictions or other commercial lease issues, please feel free to contact Christopher J. Hanlon at chanlon@hnlawfirm.com, Phone (732) 863-9900 Ext. 109.

If you are getting remarried, you obviously want to celebrate, but it is also important to focus on less exciting matters like redoing your estate plan. You may have created an estate plan during your first marriage, but this time it will probably be more complicated–especially if you have children from your first marriage or more assets. The following are some pointers for ensuring your interests are taken care of when you remarry:

• Take an inventory. The first thing you and your partner should do is each take an inventory of your assets and debts and share it with the other person. Don’t forget to include life insurance policies and retirement plans in your inventories. It is important to be open and honest about money if you want to prevent bad feelings in the future.

• Decide how you want to handle finances. Once you know what you are dealing with, then you need to decide if you want to combine (or not combine) assets when you are married. For example, if one partner is selling a house and moving in with the other partner, will he or she contribute to the cost of the house? If one partner has significant debt, you may not want to combine finances or make any joint purchases. These decisions need to be made upfront so everyone is clear on what to expect.

• Decide what you want to happen when you die. You and your future spouse need to figure out where each of you wants your assets to go when you die. If you have children from a previous marriage, this can be a complicated discussion. There is no guarantee that if you leave your assets to your new spouse, he or she will provide for your children after you are gone. There are a number of options to ensure your children are provided for, including creating a trust for your children, making your children beneficiaries of life insurance policies, or giving your children joint ownership of property. Even if you don’t have children, there may be family heirlooms or mementos that you want to keep in your family. Again, open discussions can prevent problems in the future.

• Consult an elder law or estate planning attorney. Even if you don’t have a lot of assets, you should consult an attorney, especially if you have children. You will definitely need to update your will. You may also need to update or create other estate planning documents such as a durable power of attorney and a health care proxy. If you have significant assets, a prenuptial agreement may be appropriate. In addition, the attorney can help you decide if a trust is necessary to protect your children’s interests.

• Change your beneficiaries. You may want to change the beneficiaries on your life insurance policy, annuity, and/or retirement plan. If you are divorced, however, you may not be able to change some of the beneficiaries. Bring your divorce decree with you to the attorney so he or she can make sure you do not violate the decree. If you can’t change your beneficiaries, you may want to buy additional life insurance or retirement plans that will include your new spouse.

The most important thing to remember is to be open and honest with your future spouse and your family members about your wishes.

Experienced, no nonsense attorneys for Landlords.

Commercial Landlords: Four Important Questions to Ask When a Tenant Files for Bankruptcy

With the recent downturn in the market, a number of commercial tenants are experiencing financial difficulties. In turn, this can lead to problems for commercial landlords, most importantly, the tenant staying current with lease payments. This may then lead to the tenant filing for bankruptcy protection. If your commercial tenant files for bankruptcy, it is wise to have a strategy in place to not only minimize the time of non-payment, but also maximize the ability to receive rents and damages allowed under the Bankruptcy Code. 

Following are four (4) questions for commercial landlords to review with an attorney  whenever a commercial tenant files for bankruptcy protection:

1.    Have You Filed a Proof of Claim(s)?  As soon as the tenant/debtor files for bankruptcy protection, commercial landlords should ensure their rights to payment(s) by filing appropriate proofs of claim.  It is advisable to review with your attorney the current account history and lease to ensure all fees are being accounted. Landlords may be able to file upto three (3) different types of claims:

    a.    Pre-petition Claim. Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that creditors are permitted to file a proof of claim for all pre-petition charges and assessments owed.  If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the landlord is permitted to file a proof of claim for all fees and charges incurred prior to the filing date;

    b.    Post-Petition Administrative Claim.  Section 503(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a creditor a priority claim for all “actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate”.  If the tenant remains in the premises after the bankruptcy and does not reject the lease, the commercial landlord may be allowed payment  ahead of other creditors for amounts incurred during this period; and

     c.    Post-Rejection Damage Claim. Section 503(b)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a commercial landlord the right to be paid for “post bankruptcy rejection” damages. If the tenant rejects the lease, certain damages incurred and the remainder of the lease may be permitted priority before payment of certain claims.

 2.    Is the Debtor/Tenant Assuming or Rejecting the Lease?  Landlords should inquire whether the debtor/tenant intends to assume or reject the lease.  Bankruptcy Code Section 365 provides that tenants are permitted to assume a commercial lease, as long as they cure all post-petition defaults. If they reject the lease, then the landlord may be able to proceed with an eviction action to remove the tenant. However, landlords should know that the Bankruptcy Code permits the debtor 120 days to decide whether to assume or reject the lease, with an additional 90 day extension.  All told, this can leave the landlord sitting around for more than 7 months without payment.  If your not being paid, it may be advisable to have the Bankruptcy Court allow you to proceed with an eviction action. 

 3.    Should you File a Motion for Stay Relief to Proceed with an Eviction?   The debtor/tenant may not advise their intent to assume or reject the lease.  As noted, during this time, the debtor/tenant can use the premises without paying anything.  The landlord is permitted to file a motion for “Relief from the Automatic Stay”.  This Motion, if granted,  permits the landlord to resume or commence with a state court eviction action.

4.    What to Do with Items Left by a Tenant?  If the debtor/tenant leaves equipment, inventory or equipment at the premises, can you just throw it away? Does anyone have an interest in the left over items, like the debtor/tenants’ bank?   Can you recover storage fees? When a tenant/debtor files for bankruptcy, these left over items may be part of the bankruptcy estate. Gaining proper approval from the Bankruptcy Court, before disposing of the left over “junk” is essential to limiting liability.  For instance, the left over property may be secured by a bank, financial institution or creditor. You may want to have a UCC Search conducted to ascertain whether any security interest exists.  If security interests are discovered, it is advisable to give notice to those entities, possibly through a motion with the Bankruptcy Court.
These are just a few of the questions a landlord should ask when a debtor files for bankruptcy.  By asking these questions at the start of the bankruptcy, landlords can limit the loss or liability, as well ensure their right to payment through the Bankruptcy Code.

The adult children of elderly parents in many states could be held liable for their parents’ nursing home bills as a result of the new Medicaid long-term care provisions scheduled to be voted on by the House of Representatives February 1. The children could even be subject to criminal penalties.

The 750-page Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 includes punitive new restrictions on the ability of the elderly to transfer assets before qualifying for Medicaid coverage of nursing home care. Essentially, the proposed law attempts to save the Medicaid program money by shifting more of the cost of long-term care to families and nursing homes.

One of the major ways it does this is by changing the start of the penalty period for transferred assets from the date of transfer, as is the case now, to the date when the individual would qualify for Medicaid coverage of nursing home care if not for the transfer. In other words, the penalty period would not begin until the nursing home resident was out of funds, meaning there would be no money to pay the nursing home for however long the penalty period lasts.

If the law passes, nursing homes will likely be flooded with residents who need care but have no way to pay for it. In states that have so-called “filial responsibility laws,” the nursing homes may seek reimbursement from the residents’ children. These rarely-enforced laws, which are on the books in 30 states, hold adult children responsible for financial support of indigent parents and, in some cases, medical and nursing home costs.

For example, Pennsylvania recently re-enacted its law making children liable for the financial support of their indigent parents.  Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. says the new Medicaid law could trigger a wave of lawsuits involving adult children.

According to the National Center for Policy Analysis, 21 states allow a civil court action to obtain financial support or cost recovery, 12 states impose criminal penalties for filial nonsupport, and three states allow both civil and criminal actions.

The Senate passed the bill containing the new transfer provisions before Christmas, with Vice President Dick Cheney casting the tie-breaking vote. However, procedural moves by Senate Democrats require the House to vote on the bill a second time after having passed it by a 212-206 margin at the end of an all-night session.
Those who are concerned about the impact of this bill, S. 1932, on them or their loved ones may want to make their concerns known to their congressional representative. For contact information for your congressperson, click here.

A 55-year-old individual considering long-term care insurance protection can expect to pay $709 a year if married or $1,095 if single, according to the 2008 Long-Term Care Insurance Price Index, an annual report from the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, an industry group.

A 65-year-old purchasing comparable coverage will pay $1,342 (married) or $1,999 (single) according to the report. Costs for coverage increased about 4 percent over 2007.

The annual index measures current costs for top-selling long-term care insurance policies that offer consumers approximately $115,000 in current benefits (base-level coverage), with protection increasing yearly as the individual ages. “That coverage will grow in value to over $305,000 of protection in 20 years,” explains Jesse Slome, the association’s executive director. The study compares costs for plans that provide benefits for three years or longer with an annual compound inflation option that increases the available insurance benefits by five percent compounded each year.

Below is the 2008 price index:

2008 National LTCi Price Index

Average price for a comprehensive long-term care insurance policy (100% home care benefit + skilled care coverage) 90-Day Elimination Period with 5% Compound Inflation Protection Option

Age 55
$100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $709-per-year Individual Qualifies for Preferred Health and Spousal Discounts

Age 55
$100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $1,095-per-year Individual is single (preferred health discount)

Age 55
$150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $1,064-per-year Individual Qualifies for Preferred Health and Spousal Discounts

Age 55
$150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $1,578-per-year Individual is single (preferred health discount)

Age 65
$100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $1,342-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)

Age 65
$100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $1,999-per-year Individual is single (standard health)

Age 65
$150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $2,013-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)

Age 65
$150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $2,998-per-year Individual is single (standard health)

Age 65
$240 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $3,221-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)

Age 65
$240 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period Cost: $4,729-per-year Individual is single (standard health)

You can eat at a five-star restaurant or stay at a five-star hotel. By year’s end, you’ll also be able to select a five-star nursing home.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced plans to implement a one- to five-star rating system for nursing homes to help consumers evaluate a nursing home’s quality when selecting a facility. The ratings would appear on the agency’s Nursing Home Compare Web site.
CMS will base the ratings on government inspection results, as well as staffing data and quality measures. Yet to be determined is whether the ratings will include other information, such as whether nursing homes treat patients with dementia or those on ventilators.

“We know the public is hungry for information,” said acting CMS Administrator Kerry Weems. He said lower ratings “will likely put” nursing homes “on the path to improvement . . . I don’t think we’re going to see many people who are very anxious to put a loved one in a one-star home.”

But the new rating system was criticized both by consumer advocates and the nursing home industry, for different reasons.

Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said that two of three criteria CMS plans to use for the ratings — staffing data and quality measures — are “self-reported by nursing facilities and are inaccurate.” Edelman said, “Relying on nursing homes to describe accurately how well they are doing . . . just doesn’t make sense”

Meanwhile, Bruce Yarwood, president of the American Health Care Association, a long-term care industry trade group, criticized CMS’s use of government inspection results as criteria for the ratings and said CMS should consider consumer and staff satisfaction. Yarwood said, “We do not believe that an index which relies on a broken survey system is an accurate way to measure quality”.

The New Jersey Appellate Division in an unpublished decision, Cesar S. Arredondo v. Nersy Pujols, Docket No. A-5459-05T25459-05T2, ruled that breaches of both of a lease provision and a New Jersey statute for failing to obtain municipal permits before commencing construction work were NOT grounds for evicting a commercial tenant.  Although very fact specific to a landlord with apparently “unclean hands”, this decision highlights pitfalls that can beset a landlord in the New Jersey eviction process.

Cannot Evict for “Minor” Breaches (No Permits, No Insurance, Sidewalk Sales, Etc.)

The Appellate Division agreed with the trial court on the insurance issue and the landlord’s inconsistent testimony.  However, the Appellate Division held that the breach was “not material” to warrant the tenant’s forfeiture of his leasehold interest. The Appellate Division noted that the New Jersey statute specifically provides grounds for an eviction where there is a “…violation of such covenants or agreements” of the lease. See N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53.  However, before a judgment may be entered, the landlord must establish the breach. 

Citing New Jersey case law, the Appellate Division held an eviction based on a “forfeiture” is deemed a penalty for failing to do a particular thing.  In New Jersey, the law does not favor forfeitures and requires a trial court to strictly review the provisions of the lease that a landlord seeks to forfeit the tenant’s interest, resolving any ambiguous language in favor of the tenant.

Based on the testimony and review of the lease, the Appellate Division held the breach was a minor deviation of the lease terms.  The court held that the work was undertaken under the direct order of the plaintiff and done by an independent contractor.  Further, all work was done in a workman-like fashion and that pursuant to the Jersey City inspector, the defendant could retroactively cure any of the code violations by obtaining a permit. 

Concerns for Landlords When Instituting Eviction Action Payment Defaults

This unpublished decision raises a number of pitfalls for commercial landlords. In this case, the landlord clearly failed to submit the proper proofs.  Before instituting an action to evict a tenant, landlords should consider a number is issues including:

1)     What proofs do I have?  In this case, the landlord had serious inconsistent statement, whereas the tenant’s testimony was not questioned.  Further, the tenant had two additional witnesses to prove his case, one being a city electrical inspector; and

2)     Is the Breach “Material”?  Here, failure to obtain permits was not “material”.  However, would that have changed if what the landlord was cited for resulted in a fine or penalty from the municipality?

3)     Can the Breach be Remedied before Trial?  Here, the alleged breach of the lease became a non-issue because it was remedied prior to trial. What other breaches can be remedied?

Strategic Use of Eviction Proceedings

This and other recent decisions by the Appellate Division raise pitfalls for commercial landlords in eviction proceedings. Landlords may think to strategically use the eviction process as a way in which to make the tenants become compliant with the lease.  To lessen the legal costs, landlords should take care to place in their lease that the tenant is required to pay the landlord’s attorney fees. 

In the case discussed, although an eviction did not occur, the act of taking the case to trial precipitated the tenant to obtain the proper permits and get insurance.  However, if a landlord wishes to actually evict the tenant, it is extremely important to sit down with your attorney ascertain “minor” or technical breaches.

For more information on evictions or other commercial lease issues, please feel free to contact Christopher J. Hanlon at chanlon@hnlawfirm.com.

On March 12, 2008, Washington State Governor Christine Gregoire signed into law House Bill 3104, extending 170 legal rights and responsibilities to couples in domestic partnerships (same- or opposite-sex relationships). Among the new responsibilities is that the state will treat surviving members of the couple the same as surviving spouses of married couples for purposes of estate recovery by Medicaid.

The new law, which takes effect June 12, 2008, prohibits recovery by Medicaid if the agency would not have been permitted to recover from a surviving spouse in similar circumstances.

When a landlord is seeking to terminate a residential tenancy, it is important to select the proper statutory grounds under which to proceed. Under no circumstances may a tenant be legally “evicted” without meeting a statutory prerequisite. Note that the statute may require that one or more notices be served upon the tenant prior to proceeding with court action. With the exception of a tenant’s non-payment of rent, or failure to pay rent after a reasonable increase (which requires a separate notice unto itself), a landlord is required to serve notice upon a tenant prior to the institution of court action. N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.2 provides the notice requirements. I have set forth below the text of the statute that describes the notice requirements for each section of the Anti-Eviction Act.

NJSA 2A:18-61.2. Removal of residential tenants; required notice; contents; service

No judgment of possession shall be entered for any premises covered by section 2 of this act, (2A:18-61.1) except in the nonpayment of rent under subsection a. or f. of section 2, unless the landlord has made written demand and given written notice for delivery of possession of the premises. The following notice shall be required:

a. For an action alleging disorderly conduct under subsection b. of section 2, or injury to the premises under subsection c. of section 2, or any grounds under subsection m., n., o. or p. of section 2, three days’ notice prior to the institution of the action for possession;

b. For an action alleging continued violation of rules and regulations under subsection d. of section 2, or substantial breach of covenant under subsection e. of section 2, or habitual failure to pay rent, one month’s notice prior to the institution of the action for possession;

c. For an action alleging any grounds under subsection g. of section 2, three months’ notice prior to the institution of the action;

d. For an action alleging permanent retirement under subsection h. of section 2, 18 months’ notice prior to the institution of the action and, provided that, where there is a lease in effect, no action may be instituted until the lease expires;

e. For an action alleging refusal of acceptance of reasonable lease changes under subsection i. of section 2, one month’s notice prior to institution of action;

f. For an action alleging any grounds under subsection l. of section 2, two months’ notice prior to the institution of the action and, provided that where there is a written lease in effect no action shall be instituted until the lease expires;

g. For an action alleging any grounds under subsection k. of section 2, three years’ notice prior to the institution of action, and provided that where there is a written lease in effect, no action shall be instituted until the lease expires.

h. In public housing under the control of a public housing authority or redevelopment agency, for an action alleging substantial breach of contract under paragraph (2) of subsection e. of section 2, the period of notice required prior to the institution of an action for possession shall be in accordance with federal regulations pertaining to public housing leases.

The notice in each of the foregoing instances shall specify in detail the cause of the termination of the tenancy and shall be served either personally upon the tenant or lessee or such person in possession by giving him a copy thereof, or by leaving a copy thereof at his usual place of abode with some member of his family above the age of 14 years, or by certified mail; if the certified letter is not claimed, notice shall be sent by regular mail.

NOTICE TO CEASE

Where a Notice to Cease is required, it should include as much detail as possible. This serves the dual purpose of putting the tenant on notice of a statutory (or lease) violation, and allows the tenant an opportunity to “cure” the alleged violation. If the tenant ceases the described wrongful conduct, a landlord may not proceed to terminate the tenancy. It is, in effect, a warning notice. By statute, the notice must be served upon the tenant or person in possession either personally at the demised premises, or by leaving it at “his usual place of abode with some member of his family above the age of 14 years or by certified mail; if the certified letter is not claimed, notice shall be sent by regular mail.” (See N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.2 above.)

It is advisable to cover all 3 bases. The worst thing that can happen to a landlord’s case on the day of trial is to get “shot down” for defective service of a notice. If the notices are not correct (legally sufficient) or not properly served, the court must dismiss the landlord’s case. A defective notice or defective service is a jurisdictional defect. If a jurisdictional defect exists, the court must dismiss a plaintiff’s case.  Once dismissed, you must start all over.  Starting all over means months of additional lost rent.  It is important to stress that the acts complained of must be enunciated clearly and in detail. Remember N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.2 says, “The notice in each of the foregoing instances shall specify in detail the cause of the termination of the tenancy…” The notice may not contain conflicting information. For instance, a Notice to Cease that contains a warning to a tenant not to pay rent late may not contain an additional notice that the tenant is obligated to pay late fees.

NOTICE TO QUIT

A Notice to Quit terminates the tenancy. If the tenant fails to cease the acts complained of in the Notice to Cease, after a reasonable period of time to cure has elapsed, or the statute does not require a cease notice, a landlord may serve a Notice to Quit for the statutory violation. Many landlords are under the mistaken impression that they must wait 30 days after serving a Notice to Cease before serving a Notice to Quit. This is just plain wrong. All that must elapse is a “reasonable” period of time and what is reasonable has to be determined on a case by case basis. The Notice to Quit also must contain a paragraph called “Demand for Possession.” A written demand for possession is required in all cases except for nonpayment of rent. If this language is lacking, the court will lack jurisdiction to hear the case. A Notice to Quit is generally served in the same manner as the Notice to Cease. (See above.) However, it is interesting to note that the statutes are silent as to how a Notice to Quit should be served.

NON-PAYMENT OF RENT

If a tenant fails to pay “rent” when due, a landlord may immediately proceed to commence a summary proceeding to regain possession of the premises. A landlord is under no obligation to wait for its rent, accept payments late, or accept rent in installments. However, if on the “return day” (day of court) the tenant appears and is prepared to pay all “rent” which is due, the landlord must accept the tender and dismiss the case.

N.J.S.A. 2A:18-55. Discontinuance upon payment into court of rent in arrears; receipt

If, in actions instituted under paragraph “b” of section 2A:18-53 of this title, the tenant or person in possession of the demised premises shall at any time on or before entry of final judgment, pay to the clerk of the court the rent claimed to be in default, together with the accrued costs of the proceedings, all proceedings shall be stopped. The receipt of the clerk shall be evidence of such payment. The clerk shall forthwith pay all moneys so received to the landlord, his agent or assigns.

(Case Law has held this statute is applicable to proceedings under the Anti-Eviction Act as well. (N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1.))

If a tenant agrees that certain charges constitute “additional” rent (i.e. utilities, damages, late fees) a court will likely enforce the agreement if it does not conflict with any statute, rule, regulation or ordinance such as rent control or U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development regulations (”H.U.D.”).

Like almost any rule, there is an exception to the “no notice rule” for non-payment of rent cases. When filing a non-payment of rent case against tenants receiving (1) social security old age pensions, (2) railroad retirement pensions and (3) other government pensions, these tenants are afforded a 5 day grace period to pay their rent, presumably because their checks are sent to them on or about the first day of each month. (copy of the statute appears supra.) Likewise, tenants who participate in a H.U.D. subsidy program are entitled to the additional protection of federal laws that require a written notice be served upon the tenant prior to the filing of any action for eviction.

THE LANDLORD REGISTRATION ACT

By law, every landlord of a dwelling, except owner-occupied premises with not more than two rental units, must file with the clerk of the municipality in which the residential property is situated, or with the Bureau of Housing Inspection in the Department of Community Affairs, a certificate of registration. In court, a judgment for possession cannot be entered if the landlord has not complied with this registration requirement. Non-receipt of the statement is almost a standard defense by tenants who are represented by competent counsel to avoid an immediate judgment of possession. The court has the authority to stay the proceedings for 90 days to allow the landlord to come into compliance.

A landlord is well advised to consult competent counsel when seeking to properly terminate a tenancy.

At Hanlon Niemann we have experienced, qualified attorneys and para professional staff representing Landlords statewide who appear in the Landlord Tenant section of the New Jersey Superior Court every week.  Let our experience protect you.  Contact Christopher J. Hanlon at chanlon@hnlawfirm.com, Phone (732) 863-9900 Ext. 109, or Fredrick P. Niemann, fniemann@hnlawfirm.com, Phone (732) 863-9900 Ext. 105.

With the recent downturn in the market, a number of commercial tenants are experiencing financial difficulties. In turn, this can lead to problems for commercial landlords, most importantly, the tenant staying current with lease payments. This may then lead to the tenant filing for bankruptcy protection. If your commercial tenant files for bankruptcy, it is wise to have a strategy in place to not only minimize the time of non-payment, but also maximize the ability to receive rents and damages allowed under the Bankruptcy Code. 

Following are four (4) questions for commercial landlords to review with an attorney  whenever a commercial tenant files for bankruptcy protection:

1.    Have You Filed a Proof of Claim(s)?  As soon as the tenant/debtor files for bankruptcy protection, commercial landlords should ensure their rights to payment(s) by filing appropriate proofs of claim.  It is advisable to review with your attorney the current account history and lease to ensure all fees are being accounted. Landlords may be able to file upto three (3) different types of claims:

    a.    Pre-petition Claim. Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that creditors are permitted to file a proof of claim for all pre-petition charges and assessments owed.  If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the landlord is permitted to file a proof of claim for all fees and charges incurred prior to the filing date;

    b.    Post-Petition Administrative Claim.  Section 503(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a creditor a priority claim for all “actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate”.  If the tenant remains in the premises after the bankruptcy and does not reject the lease, the commercial landlord may be allowed payment  ahead of other creditors for amounts incurred during this period; and

     c.    Post-Rejection Damage Claim. Section 503(b)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a commercial landlord the right to be paid for “post bankruptcy rejection” damages. If the tenant rejects the lease, certain damages incurred and the remainder of the lease may be permitted priority before payment of certain claims.

 2.    Is the Debtor/Tenant Assuming or Rejecting the Lease?  Landlords should inquire whether the debtor/tenant intends to assume or reject the lease.  Bankruptcy Code Section 365 provides that tenants are permitted to assume a commercial lease, as long as they cure all post-petition defaults. If they reject the lease, then the landlord may be able to proceed with an eviction action to remove the tenant. However, landlords should know that the Bankruptcy Code permits the debtor 120 days to decide whether to assume or reject the lease, with an additional 90 day extension.  All told, this can leave the landlord sitting around for more than 7 months without payment.  If your not being paid, it may be advisable to have the Bankruptcy Court allow you to proceed with an eviction action. 

 3.    Should you File a Motion for Stay Relief to Proceed with an Eviction?   The debtor/tenant may not advise their intent to assume or reject the lease.  As noted, during this time, the debtor/tenant can use the premises without paying anything.  The landlord is permitted to file a motion for “Relief from the Automatic Stay”.  This Motion, if granted,  permits the landlord to resume or commence with a state court eviction action.

4.    What to Do with Items Left by a Tenant?  If the debtor/tenant leaves equipment, inventory or equipment at the premises, can you just throw it away? Does anyone have an interest in the left over items, like the debtor/tenants’ bank?   Can you recover storage fees? When a tenant/debtor files for bankruptcy, these left over items may be part of the bankruptcy estate. Gaining proper approval from the Bankruptcy Court, before disposing of the left over “junk” is essential to limiting liability.  For instance, the left over property may be secured by a bank, financial institution or creditor. You may want to have a UCC Search conducted to ascertain whether any security interest exists.  If security interests are discovered, it is advisable to give notice to those entities, possibly through a motion with the Bankruptcy Court.

These are just a few of the questions a landlord should ask when a debtor files for bankruptcy.  By asking these questions at the start of the bankruptcy, landlords can limit the loss or liability, as well ensure their right to payment through the Bankruptcy Code.