Hanlon Niemann Blog | A Freehold, New Jersey Law Firm

Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a NJ Elder Law Attorney

Although the typical Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipient has worked for a fairly long time before the onset of his disabling condition, an adult who became disabled before turning 22 can also qualify for SSDI if she has a parent who meets certain qualifications.

SSDI is a federal program primarily designed to aid people who have become disabled after having worked for a certain amount of time. Unlike Supplemental Security Income (SSI), SSDI is not a needs-based program, which means that there are no income and asset restrictions. Instead, a beneficiary typically has to have paid into the Social Security system for at least 10 years prior to his disability. An SSDI benefit depends on the beneficiary’s income before he became disabled, the size of his family, and the amount he paid into the Social Security system. Finally, SSDI recipients can receive Medicare two years after qualifying for SSDI.

Most people who have a serious disability before turning 22 are not able to assemble the necessary work record to qualify for SSDI on their own. But people in this situation may instead be able to qualify for SSDI on their parents’ work record, in certain situations.

First, the “adult disabled child” (the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) term for a person with a disability that manifested itself before age 22) must be completely disabled according to the SSA’s adult disability standards. Second, the disability must have occurred before the potential beneficiary turned 22. Third, the potential beneficiary’s parent must have paid into the Social Security system for the required number of quarters. Finally, and most importantly, the potential beneficiary’s parent must be either dead, permanently disabled, or receiving Social Security retirement benefits.

If an adult disabled child and her parent meets all of these qualifications, then the “child” should be able to receive a substantial benefit, often greater than an SSI award. On top of the monetary gain, the child does not have to worry about her own unearned income or assets, since SSDI does not take these into account. However, if a child earns enough income through employment, the SSA may determine that she is no longer disabled and cancel her SSDI benefits. The parent’s own retirement benefits are not affected by their child’s receipt of SSDI, and the child can still qualify for SSI benefits if her SSDI payments, which count as unearned income for SSI purposes, do not disqualify her.

Parents who have not begun to receive their own Social Security income but who think that their child may qualify for SSDI in the future may want to have their child screened by the Social Security system for his disability before he reaches age 22. If this is not possible, it pays to have the child’s physician clearly document all of the information surrounding the child’s disability from as early an age as possible. This way, when the parent does retire, the child has a long record showing the presence of the disabling condition before he turned 22, making the SSDI application easier.

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., NJ Elder Law Attorney
 
Often times when I meet with new clients, the first appointment is not with the parent(s) but with the children.  Commonly, they come to us after or during a crisis, such as a parent’s hospital or nursing home stay.  Just as often they have little or no information about what is going on with the parent, medically and financially, and cannot provide much of the information we need to assist them.

Communication between parent and child before a crisis is so important and can provide peace of mind and reduce stress for both.  The following are some of the questions that families should discuss, which will often begin a dialogue about the type of preplanning parents can do before a crisis occurs.

1. Children should know roughly how much and where their parents’ assets are.  Do they have enough to sustain the healthy spouse should one spouse become ill and need extended hospitalization and/or nursing home care?

2. What does the income picture look like?  If one spouse dies, how much income will the surviving spouse be left with?  Will there be a significant drop in income?  Often time’s steps can be taken before that spouse passes to help boost the surviving spouse’s income.

3. Is financial support anticipated?  People are living longer than ever.  Many people are at risk of outliving their money.   Answering this question means not simply looking at current expenses vs. income but looking at the next step in the elder care journey and the next step after that and asking “Do I have enough to pay for long term care and if so, for how long?  And if not, what is my plan then?

4. What types of insurance are there (ie., health, long term care, life)?  Is coverage adequate? If not, can coverage be increased?  You certainly want to do that before you become uninsurable.

5. Are there a power of attorney and a health care directive and where are they?  Are they up to date or stale?  If these documents are not in place then the only alternative is a costly and time-consuming process called guardianship.  The court will be involved in your family’s affairs and you may not get the result you want.

6. Is there an up to date will?  A clear, thought out estate plan can avoid family squabbles after the parent passes away. Even people with small estates should have a will.  Also, make sure the original will can be located. Probating a copy is difficult and expensive.

For further information and advice in any elder law or estate planning matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, toll-free at 888-800-7442, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., NJ Wills, Trusts & Estate Attorney

Very often, when I prepare wills, powers of attorney and health care directives (living wills) for clients, some react with surprise when they see the length of my documents.  “Why”, they say, “is the will you are preparing multiple pages when my previous one was only 2?”   “The document is designed to cover as many scenarios as possible”, I explain, “not knowing which scenario may in fact occur”.  It is not good enough to simply address the most likely ones, especially if yours turns out to be one of the uncommon ones.

Narrowly or poorly drafted wills can cause unpleasant and expensive results.  Let’s take the simple task of designating an executor, the person who is appointed the official representative of the estate and is charged with gathering the assets, paying the debts and taxes, if any, and following the instructions set forth in the will and making final distributions to the heirs.  It is a good idea to have one or more backup or alternate executors, in case someone can’t or won’t serve, when the time comes.

Now, most people would think in terms of the executor dying as the reason a back up is necessary, but that is just one possible scenario. Yet, I not infrequently see a will drawn up that states “if my executor dies then I appoint my alternate to serve”.  Let’s say Child A is the executor and Child B is the alternate.  Mom dies and A doesn’t want to serve.  No problem. A will step aside in favor of B, right?.  Except that A is alive and the will only provides that B can serve if A has died.  (Note the key term “died”, not refused to serve).  So, what now?

B can serve as administrator.  Same role and responsibilities but some very important differences. An executor can serve without a bond if the will so provides but an administrator cannot.  And that can be an expensive difference.  The bond acts similar to an insurance policy in that the company issuing the bond will pay out the inheritance if the assets are lost or misappropriated.  The bigger the estate the higher the cost, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars.  While a bond can be very important, many close knit families see it as unnecessary.  Unfortunately, in our case there is no choice.   Had the will stated that the alternate can step in if the executor dies or otherwise can’t or won’t serve, then the bond could have been avoided.  A very expensive mistake and a reason you want to be sure that the attorney drafting your will is experienced in estate planning or elder law.

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, particularly your will, trust or estate planning documents, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., NJ Estate Administration Attorney

If you inherit property, of course you should be grateful and count your blessings. Still, consider the possibility that the gift may come with a big string attached-a debt linked to the prop¬erty, such as is particularly common with real estate or a car. In that event, the question arises as to whether the debt must be satisfied from the particu¬lar asset or from the decedent’s estate more generally. How this question is answered can cause a big swing in the respective gift amounts for beneficiar¬ies of an estate.

Historically, the law presumed that the debt was not to be paid from the property that was connected to it. The reasoning was that a true gift should not come laden with such a burden. Over time, as taking on debt became commonplace, this thinking changed and statutes flipped the conventional assumption. Increasingly, these laws start from the premise that the property left to someone includes the debt on the property, unless the decedent in his or her will clearly indicated a different intent. That is where careful estate planning, with professional guidance, comes in.

It is best to leave no doubt for the ordinary lay reader of a will. A general directive in the will to pay all debts of the testator is too nebulous. Instead, if the intent is not to keep the asset joined to the debt, language something like this should be used in a will: “If [the specific asset] is subject to a mortgage, security interest, or other lien, I direct that my executor pay the debt from other prop¬erty of my estate which is not given to a specific person or entity.”

This scenario was played out re¬cently in a case in which a farmer left to his (favored?) son three different farms, each of which was encumbered by debt. To his other son he left the residue of the estate. When the father died, the executor used part of the es¬tate proceeds to pay off the loans to the farms, so that the first son would re¬ceive them debt-free. Not surprisingly, the second son, whose inheritance was thereby diminished, brought the matter to court.

The second son prevailed, forcing payment of the debts for the farms to come from the farms themselves. The father’s will directed in a general way that debts were to be paid from the estate. However, under the relevant state statute, that was not a sufficiently explicit indication of intent to satisfy the debts on the farms from the residu¬ary estate. In other words, the will had not clearly shown an intent that the first son was to receive the farms debt-free. As a result, the first son got the three farms, but he, not the second son, also got the responsibility for paying off the attached encumbrances, which totaled almost a quarter of a million dollars.

For further information and advice in any estate matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.